|
The Human Needs Report is the Coalition on Human Needs' newsletter on national policy issues affecting low-income and vulnerable populations. It is published every other week while Congress is in session.
Article from the May, 21 2004 editionof the CHN Human NeedsReport:The House continued its weekly tax cut drive when it agreed to a 10-year $228 billion child tax credit bill (HR 4359) on Thursday, May 19. (Since the cost of the credit will come out of borrowed money, adding the interest payments brings the total to $279 billion.) The bill makes permanent the $1,000 tax credit per child first enacted in 2001, but also makes families with much higher incomes newly eligible. Adding these families comes with a $69 billion price tag ($87 billion counting the added interest payments), or more than 30 percent of the total. The bill passed by a 271-139 vote. (To see how your member voted click here)
HR 4359 raises the point at which the tax credit begins to phase out from thecurrent $110,000 to $250,000 for married couples and from $75,000 to $125,000for single taxpayers. That means couples with incomes up to about $300,000 willreceive at least some of the credit. Those with incomes between $150,000 and$250,000 will receive the full $1,000 a year per child. A family in this incomerange with two children would reduce their taxes by $2,000 a year, or $22,000over the 10 years covered by the bill.
Meanwhile, the bill does very little for families with low incomes. It acceleratesby one year an increase in the portion of the child tax credit available to workingfamilies with earnings so low that they owe little or no income tax. (Under currentlaw, this increase is scheduled to take effect in 2005.) A family earning $12,000would gain $62.50 in 2004 because of the one-year increase for low-income families.
The House chose to spend $87 billion to extend the child tax credit to familieswith higher incomes, but did not extend the credit to working families with lowerincomes than will qualify under current law. Only families earning more than$10,750 in 2004 will be eligible. Families working full time at the minimum wageearn $10,712 – the child tax credit is not available to them. Accordingto David Harris of the Children’s Research and Education Institute, about8 million children live in families with earnings below $10,500 – noneof them will receive any benefit from the child tax credit.
Why does it matter that the bill is not paid for? Because the tax cutting fervorthat has gripped Congress since 2001 has drained the federal treasury and putat risk federal programs that serve working poor families, children, the elderly,those without health insurance and other vulnerable Americans. The total costof the tax cuts the House has passed in the past four weeks is about $600 billion,including interest - all of it from borrowed money. This is a bad deal for low-incomefamilies because their small tax cuts will be overwhelmed by losses in servicesor benefits. Both the President’s budget and the plan just adopted in theHouse provide a first taste of the cuts to come, with cuts proposed in budgetareas including housing, child care, WIC, and Medicaid. Low-income families wholose subsidized housing, are placed on WIC or child care waiting lists, or receiveless Medicaid coverage will not be able to make up those losses with the littlethey get in tax cuts.
For More Information:
CBPP: Who Would Pay for theHouse’s “Free Lunch” Tax Cuts?
CBPP: House Bill Adds DeficitFinanced Tax Cuts
Washington Post Editorial: Leave NoRich Child Behind
Fair Taxes For All: New Tax Giveaway Disguised as a Middle-Class Tax Cut |
